Foes of mining measure still flush with cash

BACKLASH: Palin draws criticism from the vote yes side.

August 22, 2008 

With the election four days away, the vote no side in the contentious and expensive battle over Ballot Measure 4 still has plenty of money left to spend.

The mining-related initiative also got a boost from Gov. Sarah Palin, who said this week she plans to vote no.

Palin's comment on the initiative drew a backlash from the vote yes side, which filed a legal complaint Wednesday accusing her and state regulators of improperly weighing in against Measure 4.

Late Thursday night, they prevailed in their complaint against state regulators. After listening to hours of testimony, the Alaska Public Offices Commission ordered the state to take down its web site that tries to explain the initiative. A more detailed ruling is expected today.

State regulators claimed that their statements on Measure 4 -- published Tuesday on the state Web site -- were authorized by the Legislature and were intended to be neutral.

As for Palin, she made it clear that she was speaking personally, not as the governor, when she said she'd vote no, said Ruth Hamilton-Heese, an assistant attorney general in the Alaska Department of Law, defending the state.

But Measure 4 proponents argued the state's "neutral" statements were actually all negative about the proposed law and improperly echoed the mining industry's concerns.

Measure 4 would ban large metal mines from discharging harmful amounts of toxic chemicals into salmon streams or drinking water supplies.

State officials say their regulations already bar mines from doing that. The proponents of the measure disagree. They say the state isn't doing enough to protect salmon streams.

So far, the vote yes and vote no campaigns have raised nearly $10 million to capture Alaskans' votes, according to recent disclosure reports.

Here's a breakdown of their recent efforts:

• The Council of Alaska Producers, a group of metal mining companies, is sitting on as much as $9 million that hasn't been spent yet, according to its filing this week with state regulators.

• On the yes side of Measure 4, a secretive soft-money group based in Alexandria, Va., Americans for Job Security, bumped up its support of the proposed law to $1.6 million this month.

• Anchorage millionaire Bob Gillam chipped in $250,000 this month; so far, he's disclosed spending more than a half million dollars for the yes campaign.


Find Elizabeth Bluemink online at adn.com/contact/ebluemink or call 257-4317.


Big donors on both sides of Measure 4

Big donors to the yes vote:

Americans for Job Security: $1.6 million

Bob Gillam: $520,000

Renewable Resources Coalition: $150,000

Big donors to the no vote:

Council of Alaska Producers: $6.9 million *

Alaska Native Corporations' PAC: $268,960

NANA Regional Corp.: $142,734

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service

Top Jobs

View All

Find a Home

$845,000 Anchorage
3 bed, 2 full bath, 1 half bath. LAKE w/AIRPLANE rights! ...

Find a Car

Search New Cars