Borough hesitates backing Bristol Bay petroleum leases

ALEUTIANS EAST: Support is key to allowing federal sale in the area.

June 17, 2009 

The U.S. Minerals Management Service for years has counted on a remote local government, the Aleutians East Borough, as a key supporter of the offshore oil and gas lease sale proposed for the North Aleutian basin in 2011.

Lately, however, the borough's relationship with MMS has become strained, raising the possibility that a friend might turn against the controversial lease sale.

The evidence is a flurry of letters the borough sent to MMS officials in March questioning the agency's approach on preparations for the sale, including the drafting of an environmental impact statement.

The letters complain of poor scheduling, inadequate baseline research to document the sale area's commercially important fish and crab resources, lack of information on the different sale alternatives MMS is planning, and lack of federal funding to cover travel and other costs so borough residents can participate meaningfully in the planning process.

The borough also is pressing MMS to require lease terms for protecting fisheries, fishermen and the environment, and for ensuring jobs for local residents. MMS, however, is pushing back on some of these demands.

The tenor of the letters suggests the borough is prepared to pull its support for the lease sale, which is controversial because it would occur in the outer waters of Bristol Bay, an area known for its extraordinary abundance of salmon and other fish as well as king crab and marine mammals.

"AEB has reserved the right to withdraw support for oil and gas leasing in the North Aleutian Basin during the Environmental Impact Statement Process and Lease Sale Process if our concerns have not been addressed," says a March 4 letter from borough Administrator Sharon Boyette to an MMS official. "As a heads up, MMS's lack of response on our proposed mitigation measures, and delay or unwillingness to commit to lease sale stipulation language is beginning to cause us concern."

BOROUGH SUPPORT VITAL

In a March 10 letter, MMS Alaska Regional Director John Goll acknowledged the agency badly needs the borough's backing.

"We realize the importance of local support for this lease sale and fully believe that the State of Alaska's support is contingent on local support for which the AEB has assumed a lead role," Goll's letter says.

In interviews this month, both Boyette and MMS officials in Anchorage said they believe relations are improving since the exchange of letters.

But much work remains in the run-up to the lease sale, assuming the Obama administration proceeds with it.

BOLD ENDORSEMENT

The Aleutians East Borough encompasses the western end of the rugged Alaska Peninsula, as well as numerous islands. Its roughly 3,000 residents live mainly in the villages of Sand Point, King Cove, Akutan, Cold Bay, False Pass and Nelson Lagoon. Commercial fishing is the borough's mainstay industry.

The borough is the closest local government to the offshore zone considered most prospective for exploratory drilling.

In October 2005, the Aleutians East Borough Assembly voted unanimously in support of allowing oil and gas leasing in Bristol Bay, if fish are protected, exploration is conducted in an environmentally safe manner and oil and gas companies provide jobs and business opportunity for local residents.

The borough sees major potential for increased tax revenue and local employment for a region where commercial salmon fishing struggled beginning in the late 1990s in part because of competition from foreign fish farmers.

The borough's qualified support for offshore leasing stands in contrast to the opposition voiced by other local governments and Native organizations around Bristol Bay.

Also opposed are many environmental groups who helped successfully campaign for the federal government to buy back leases sold for $95 million in 1988.

THE COMPLAINTS

Among the borough's complaints:

• Lack of an agreed schedule for collaborating on the EIS for the 2011 lease sale. The problem is compounded, the borough notes, because the borough mayor and many other residents are fishing in June and July, making it impossible for them to participate in the planning.

• Poor progress on dozens of fishery, air, oceanographic, oil spill and other studies the borough believes are necessary. One borough letter complains the MMS offered a 21-year-old study of seismic noise impacts on Dungeness crab larvae, when what is really needed is a study of potential seismic impacts on Bristol Bay's valuable king and Tanner crab.

• Lack of clarity on what alternatives the MMS is considering for the lease sale. In a March 2 letter, the borough said it had seen only an outline of six alternatives under consideration, including one specifying, "Defer all oil prone lease blocks." The borough asked where those blocks are located, and complained that MMS had failed to provide maps of the proposed lease sale area with overlays of fishery and critical habitat areas.

• No apparent MMS plans to study Balboa Bay, on the south side of the Alaska Peninsula near Sand Point. The bay is where Shell -- the oil company hoping to explore the gas-prone North Aleutian Basin and produce from several offshore platforms -- has said it might place a liquefied natural gas plant and tanker port.

"If the plan is to build an LNG plant in this bay, we need good data here," a March 5 borough letter says. "We are already starting to hear local concern and resistance to development in Balboa Bay, and we need to be in a position to show that there is high quality baseline data and knowledge of this bay and demonstrate that a system is in place to protect fish and shellfish resources."

• Uncertainly over what MMS will require of explorers as lease stipulations. The borough is seeking such requirements as compensation for fishermen in the event of a spill or other harm, jobs for local residents and something approaching zero discharge of drilling fluids and wastes.

In its March 10 reply to Boyette, the borough administrator, Goll wrote that "we do not have the authority to implement" all the borough's preferred mitigation measures.

He promised to set up meetings to talk about environmental studies, leasing alternatives, maps and other borough concerns.

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service