Gulf spill victims learn from Alaskans

EXXON VALDEZ: Veterans of '89 disaster offer helpful perspectives.

June 11, 2010 

Oil spill cleanup workers in 1989 use pressure washers to wash oil from the beach on Smith Island, Prince William Sound. The experience Alaskans gained in dealing with the Exxon Valdez spill is proving helpful to the ongoing effort to battle the BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

BOB HALLINEN / DAILY NEWS ARCHIVE 1989

With their futures dark and confused, desperate residents of the Gulf of Mexico are turning to veterans of Alaska's Exxon Valdez oil spill for clues about what they are facing. The word from Alaska, whether about cleanup, economic recovery, despondency or lawsuits: Expect years of deep trouble ahead, but there are also ways to cope.

"Here's a life-changing and terrible event, and the less people know about it, the more concerned they get," said Stan Senner, who served as science coordinator for the federal-state agency set up to study and recover from the 1989 Alaska oil spill. "No one wants to hear bad news, but even worse is just simply not knowing the news."

Senner, now director of conservation science for the nonprofit Ocean Conservancy, is among dozens of Exxon Valdez experts who have been trekking around the Gulf, attending community meetings, boating through marshes threatened by oil, and lobbying officials to avoid mistakes made 21 years ago in Alaska. Other Alaskans who have remained home are taking phone calls by the dozens from the area.

For Rick Steiner, a retired University of Alaska marine science professor who spent years studying Prince William Sound and advocating reduced reliance on petroleum, the battle was lost the moment oil got away.

"You can respond with thousands of people and thousands of boats and millions of feet of boom and skimmers, but you're not going to be very effective," said Steiner, reached by phone near Barataria Bay in Louisiana, where he has been working with environmental groups and volunteers.

"The damage will be done," said Steiner. "There's really no easy way to rehabilitate oiled wildlife, no easy way to restore an oil- injured ecosystem and there's certainly no easy way to make lives whole that were turned upside down by these things. Those are lessons we learned the hard way in Alaska and they're lessons that are being learned here, very poignantly."

In some cases, seeing the Gulf spill has rekindled the smoldering anger that many Alaskans still carry from the Exxon Valdez.

"We didn't learn much in 21 years," said John Devens, the mayor of Valdez when the Exxon Valdez came aground on Bligh Reef March 24, 1989. "BP seems to be making exactly the same mistakes Exxon made."

LIKE THE GULF SPILL -- AND DIFFERENT

Steiner, Senner and others note that there are substantial differences between the Exxon Valdez oil spill and the BP gusher in the Gulf. The Exxon Valdez held a known volume of oil. Even if the tanker had broken up before its undamaged tanks could be off-loaded, no more than 54 million gallons would spill into Prince William Sound. The latest estimates say the Gulf well has been gushing about a million gallons a day with no likely halt to the flow until relief wells are completed in August, though some is now being captured by a suction pipe.

Prince Williams Sound is a small, relatively closed body of water, and the oil quickly left on currents and spread to the Gulf of Alaska. In less than two months, it had traveled nearly 500 miles, oiling the Alaska Peninsula shoreline -- roughly the distance from where the Deepwater Horizon exploded to Miami. By comparison, the Gulf of Mexico is much more confined.

The BP spill is rising from 5,000 feet below the ocean surface, causing some amount of oil to disperse through the water column even without the use of chemical dispersants, which are also being applied. The Exxon Valdez dumped its oil on the surface, where it globbed up in a mousse-like consistency and quickly came ashore on rocky beaches, tidal pools and salt marshes. The thick layer of oil lent itself to removal by skimmers, though there weren't enough and the opportunity to pick up more oil was lost when storms struck Prince William Sound three days after the spill.

In sparsely populated Alaska, the main effects were felt in the fishing towns of Cordova, Valdez, Homer and Kodiak, and in tiny coastal Native villages that relied on subsistence gathering from the once pristine waters. The government presence consisted of Alaska and U.S. agencies.

The Gulf of Mexico involves four state governments, numerous counties or parishes, fishing communities of many different ethnic groups, a major tourism economy and a historic petroleum industry that had spilled before.

Still, the Exxon Valdez veterans see far more similarities than differences.

Steve Picou, a sociology professor of the University of South Alabama in Mobile, was a regular visitor to Alaska following the Exxon Valdez spill, studying its long-term social costs, including increased rates of bankruptcies, substance abuse, divorce and suicides. An expert in disasters, he now has a close-up view of an evolving one from his home in Orange Beach, Ala., one of the BP-affected communities. He has been spending most of his time lately on the road, trying to educate communities and mental health professionals about what to expect.

"We're trying to explain to people this is going to be a long-term situation -- the table is set just like in 1989. Everyone is very, very distracted, maximally disrupted, they're expressing anger," Picou said.

After the 1989 spill, Picou said, a second disastrous wave broke over the communities: 19 years of litigation and successful appeals by Exxon that ultimately reduced its damages for 32,000 fishermen and Native plaintiffs from a jury-awarded $5 billion to $507 million. The result was a loss of faith in the legal system, Picou said, and more injury to injury.

Picou said he expects the BP spill to result in even more complex litigation, in part because the current spill might have 10 times the number victims than in Alaska, and in part because BP, the drilling contractor and other companies involved in the blowout are pointing fingers at each other.

His advice for weathering the storm: stick together, even if fate shines brighter on some than others. In Alaska, communities became deeply divided when some boat owners got lucrative Exxon spill-cleanup contracts while other didn't, a situation he's already seeing now with BP. In Alaska, the contractors were snubbed as "spillionaires." That turned out to be the "first stake driven into these communities," Picou said.

"Hug people -- hug your friends and hug relatives a lot," he added. "Be there. And realize that if this community can get through this catastrophe collectively, then you will be a successful survivor."

"AN AMAZING LACK OF INFORMATION"

Denny Kelso was Alaska's commissioner of Environmental Conservation in 1989. The day of the spill, he and then Gov. Steve Cowper motored out to the tanker, climbed up a rope ladder and stood on the deck as oil continued to boil from the holds. At a hearing later before Congress, he famously declared the industry's spill cleanup plan was "probably the biggest piece of maritime fiction since 'Moby Dick.' "

Today he's executive vice president of the Ocean Conservancy and has been dividing his time between home in California and the Gulf of Mexico. Kelso is among many Exxon Valdez veterans to criticize the use of dispersants that break down the oil. It makes the oil less visible but at least as toxic, he said. And oil treated with dispersants is more likely to get through booms protecting critical shoreline because it's not floating as a mass on the surface.

Kelso ridiculed the notion expressed by one BP official that the oil would be cleaned up within weeks of the blowout being capped. It will take years to remove the oil and decades to restore damaged resources, he said.

Charles Wohlforth, now an author of books focused on the environment, was a reporter who covered the Exxon Valdez spill using a boat purchased for the story by the Anchorage Daily News. Wohlforth said the boat was an essential tool to get the story independently of the Exxon and federal public relations apparatus that tried to hide the extent of the damage.

"It's been really disturbing to watch BP's behavior be so similar to what Exxon's was in terms of downplaying stuff and creating their own reality, saying there is no subsurface oil, trying to hide how much is actually leaking. All this stuff is amazingly similar to the Exxon Valdez playbook, and the government is playing right into it," Wohlforth said.

Even worse, said both Wohlforth and Senner, the former Exxon Valdez science coordinator, is the secrecy now being applied to research by federal scientists. Wohlforth said one of his best science sources from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration during the Exxon Valdez is now refusing to talk about BP out of concern for future litigation, he said.

Senner said a key lesson learned in Exxon Valdez was the need for "complete transparency on the part of the government in what they know and what they're doing to find out what they don't know."

But the Gulf spill has gotten off to a bad start, he said. "There's an amazing lack of information about what is being done and what the government knows," he said.

ASSERTING LOCAL CONTROL

The Prince Williams Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory Council, created in the post-Exxon Valdez political climate as an industry watchdog, has playing two distinct roles in the Gulf. It's been sharing its wealth of knowledge on spill response, and it's providing a model for Gulf communities on how they can assert long-term oversight once the immediate disaster has abated.

Council spokesman Stan Jones said a board member, Homer fisherman John Velsko, is in the Gulf now trying to organize a fishermen response.

"Pulling a string of boom is like pulling a net," Jones said. "One thing we've been saying to people who call from the Gulf is, it would really be good if you could incorporate (the fishing) industry into the response plan down there. They know the most, they're always there, they don't have to be brought in from somewhere else and they're highly motivated."

But perhaps the biggest impact the council can have is serving as model for the Gulf communities after the spill, said Kelso, the former DEC commissioner.

The council was created by Congress as part of series of reforms after the Exxon Valdez. Its funding comes from industry, and its board selection process promotes representation of the region's many interests.

Devens, the former Valdez mayor who served as executive director of the council for 12 years, said the organization is a guardian against complacency and "regulatory capture" -- the corruption of state or federal agencies that become too cozy with the powerful industries they're supposed to oversee.

When the industry contingency plan for Prince William Sound requires that it have 350 fishing vessels under contract to respond in case of a spill, the council checks to make sure those contracts exist and that there's boom on hand for them to deploy, Devens said.

One item no longer in stock in Valdez: the stash of Corexit 9527, shipped recently to Gulf, said Jones. And good riddance, he added.

"This council almost from Day 1, and increasingly as time has gone by, has had deep, deep, deep reservations about dispersants," he said.

They often don't work in Alaska's cold waters, so they just add to pollution levels without accomplishing anything, he said. And when they work, he added, they push oil from the surface into the water column, where fish and shellfish live.

"WE'LL SEE YOU IN COURT"

Riki Ott, a biologist who was working for Cordova fishermen during the Exxon Valdez spill and has since authored two books on the event, is also working with Gulf communities from her new "base camp" in bayou country. She's also been trying to promote safety precautions among spill workers.

Her message? BP's pledge to make communities whole means, "We'll see you in court." The lesson from Cordova is to not wait for BP. "We wasted time waiting for Exxon to make us whole," she said.

"Here's the scary thing -- who really learned the lesson? I think it was the oil industry, and what they learned was, take very aggressive measures to control the images," Ott said, referring to the difficulties that news media and environmental groups have had in getting to spill sites, including restrictions imposed by the Coast Guard and the FAA.

"No cameras, no evidence, no problem. They are like a house afire here, trying to capture one agency after another and use these agencies to shield themselves from liability, from the public, from the media. Exxon didn't have it down quite this good," Ott said.


Find Richard Mauer online at adn.com/contact/rmauer or call 257-4345.

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service