Can Alaska really curb its appetite for blue-state money?

August 30, 2010 

Far-right voters in Alaska -- those who, for example, voted for Joe Miller in last week's GOP Senate primary -- must be a little embarrassed by their red state's dependence on income taken in taxes from blue states, writes Los Angeles Times columnist Patt Miller. Are these Alaskans seriously ready to cope with the result of Miller's "stop the pork" rhetoric, should the rest of the nation decide to take him up on the offer?

Writes Morrison:

Red-state voters, in the main, depend on blue-state voters to keep them afloat when it comes to federal money. ... This imbalance in the balance sheets constitutes the down-to-dollars facts that underlie part of the story of the expanding American frontier, that people did it all by themselves. Without question, it takes tough types of people to gut it out and cut it in the desert and the mountains and the plains -- but the huge amounts of federal money that went into massive water and reclamation projects, soil and agriculture projects, bridges and highways, built the framework and underpinnings that helped to make the settlement and growth possible. ...

Miller is being laudably consistent with his political policies and priorities when he says this; the question is, will his fellow Alaskans, who have benefited from and even been proud of the big take-home checks from Washington, be able to live on the budget Miller suggests?

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service