Alaska Supreme Court approves legislative redistricting plan

Proposal still must be approved by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Associated PressMay 22, 2012 

JUNEAU -- A divided Alaska Supreme Court on Tuesday approved a redistricting map for this year's elections, opting against a plan that redrew Southeast Alaska districts.

The court, in a 3-2 decision, cited numerous objections to the way the Alaska Redistricting Board redrew the region and said there was a risk the U.S. Department of Justice would not clear the plan.

"Notice of the failure of the Department of Justice to pre-clear the new districts would come so late in the 2012 election cycle that a great disruption to the election process would occur," the court said in its opinion.

It can take up to 60 days for Justice to decide on clearance.

The candidate filing deadline is June 1. The primary is scheduled for Aug. 28.

The court decided the plan to be used for this year's elections will be the one adopted by the board in April.

The board's executive director, Taylor Bickford, has said the plan is substantially similar to one sent back by the court for further work earlier this year, though there are differences. For example, the Aleutian chain isn't split, and Fairbanks' two Democratic senators, Joe Thomas and Joe Paskvan, would not be forced to run against each other.

Justices Daniel Winfree and Craig Stowers dissented from the order, preferring instead to have the elections conducted under a map that reconfigured Southeast Alaska districts.

In April, Superior Court Judge Michael McConahy rejected the plan that is now expected to govern this year's elections, in part because he found the board didn't redraw Southeast Alaska based on state constitutional requirements. The Supreme Court earlier this month ordered the board to redraw House and Senate districts in the region, with the result eliciting a handful of challenges claiming, among other things, that the proposal would disenfranchise rural communities in the region.

Justice must still give preclearance to a plan OK'd by the court for the 2012 elections.

Tuesday's order isn't the last word in the case, and there remains the potential for Southeast Alaska to be reworked for future elections.

The court still hasn't decided the board's appeal of McConahy's decision. When an opinion is rendered, it "will contain a discussion of and directions concerning the reconfiguration of Southeast Districts, and will seek to ensure that districts that comply with the Alaska Constitution can receive timely review by the Department of Justice for use in subsequent elections," the court said.

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service