Coast Guard intercepts alleged North Pacific driftnet pirates

Associated PressAugust 7, 2012 

The commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard gave U.S. senators a dramatic example of challenges faced by the agency in Alaska as it patrols the North Pacific.

Admiral Robert J. Papp, Jr. on Monday announced that the 378-foot Honolulu-based cutter Rush had been assigned to Alaska waters but was off the coast of Japan pursuing a vessel suspected of illegal high seas driftnet fishing.

"I would call this fishing piracy that is going on," Papp said during a hearing in Kodiak by the U.S. Senate Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee.

The vessel was boarded and found with 40 tons of illegal fish.

"They put eight miles of net out there and collect everything that flows through it," he said, possibly picking up migratory stocks destined for Alaska waters.

David Mosely, a Coast Guard spokesman in Anchorage, would not say when or where the pursuit of the other vessel began, citing agency policy to not comment on ongoing investigations.

Papp said the Coast Guard is working with other departments on the case.

"We have something called the Maritime Operational Threat Response organization, which works across State and Justice and other departments -- and we've come to a national objective of seizing this, what amounts to, we found out now, is a stateless vessel," he said.

The vessel carried Chinese citizens who were manning the vessel, Papp said, and may be passed to China for prosecution.

"As a fallback, we can bring it back to the United States for prosecution as well," he said.

U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., chaired the subcommittee hearing. "I hope we're filing charges -- not just against the men operating the ship, but the buyers of these fish, and tracking it down to the networks that are funding these kinds of illegal operations," Landrieu said.

Paul Niemeier, who works in the International Fisheries Affairs Division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said Tuesday high seas driftnets have been banned internationally since 1992. In the early 1990s, hundreds of vessels were setting them, he said. Each net was an average of 30 to 60 miles long killed unintended targets.

"Driftnets don't differentiate, don't select very well what they catch," he said by phone from Silver Spring, Md. "Anything that swims into them has a pretty good possibility of getting tangled up. So they were catching marine mammals and seabirds and sharks -- anything under the sun, including the target species, which back in those days was either tuna or salmon, depending on the mesh size."

If a fish can get its head through the mesh, it will get caught behind the gill flaps, Niemeier said. Bigger species hit the net, twist and turn, and get tangled up.

"That's the way a lot of the sharks and marine mammals and seabirds used to get caught, just twisting around in the net."

The problem has dramatically declined. Just five or six years ago, he said, there were more than 100 sightings of suspected illegal fishing boats. Last year, there were two sightings. The Coast Guard seized one vessel and the other escaped.

"It's still a concern, but at least the numbers are a lot less than they used to be, and it seems like they're using smaller nets," he said. That may be because they're easier to pick up and run with, too. You don't just pick up a 30-mile net very easily."

Note: An earlier version of this article mistakenly reported that the cutter Rush is Alaska-based.

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service