Letter: Let’s give ‘humanitarian aid’ a chance to work in Syria

September 10, 2013 

Has everyone forgotten Rumsfeld’s and Cheney’s glib affirmation that the attack on Iraq would be finished in a matter of days or weeks of “shock and awe?”  How did that work out?

Now our country is talking about “surgical” strikes on Syria. No civilians will die, they say — except for a few possibly from “collateral damage.” How dead is “collaterally” dead?  Such precision, they say, will mean only the “bad guys” will be hit. But Assad is now hiding the “bad guys” among the innocent, or noncombatant citizens. 

No “boots on the ground,” say Kerry and the president. But if any boots get on the ground, they’ll be filled by American feet, and blown off, along with other body parts.

Granted, Assad did a horrible thing, gassing his own people. Until the U.N. makes a statement on the matter, we would be insane to act unilaterally. If we want to do something for the Syrian people, let’s see if anyone can say “humanitarian aid?” That kills no one, could help many, and would not anger the whole Middle East any more than they now hate us.

— Don McDermott



Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service