Letter: Towering troubles in the Mat-Su

November 22, 2013 

The Mat-Su Assembly certainly did no favors to borough property owners with their “open for business” policy concerning the erection of communications towers. What were they thinking? (ADN, Nov. 14, 2013)

The communications industry seized the moment to site and erect towers throughout the borough without the need for bothersome permits and public involvement. I was recently surprised and dismayed to find that GCI had, unbeknownst to me, erected a large tower right across the street from a lot I own in the Knik area. The Mat-Su Borough has no inventory of these towers as their builders had no duty to apply for construction permits.

Now the borough has decided that tower erection with reckless abandon is not such a good thing and that perhaps regulations such as setback requirements are in order. I do not know at this time whether or not the proposed regulations will impact my particular lot but I guess I can take small comfort in knowing I will have excellent cell coverage.

— Michael Hall

Anchorage

Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service