Letter: King Cove shouldn’t face a 'no’

December 26, 2013 

A number of years ago, I read an article about an environmental controversy regarding a proposed project here in Alaska. A person from outside Alaska who objected to the development was interviewed for the story. When asked if he had been to Alaska, he said, “No.” When asked if he thought he might ever visit Alaska, he said, “Probably not.” So why was he so passionate about an area he likely will never see? He responded, “It lifts my spirit just knowing that it’s there.”

I’m all in favor of lifting spirits. I’m just not sure it should be done at the expense of the safety, health and welfare of nearly 1,000 Americans who have very limited options when responding to emergencies. If the federal government has the discretion to block construction of a lifeline road between King Cove and the airport at Cold Bay, it follows that it has an obligation to devise and fund a viable alternative. Just saying “no” is not good enough.

— Ted Moninski


Anchorage Daily News is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service