Nation/World

How Britain's breakup with the EU could reshape world markets

LONDON — First came the shock. Then fear seized world markets. As frenzied selling accelerated in Tokyo, Hong Kong and London, unfathomable amounts of wealth vanished in a matter of hours.

In crudest outlines, the panic that followed Britain's vote to quit the European Union traced the 2008 collapse of Lehman Brothers, an event that turned an unfolding financial crisis into the bleakest economic downturn since the Great Depression. The similarities hung uneasily over markets Friday, presenting a grim question: How ugly might things get?

As economists pored over the rout like accident investigators dispatched to the scene of a crash, most offered assurances that a Lehman-style financial panic was not unfolding. In that debacle, investors indiscriminately fled all assets connected to the disastrous U.S. housing bubble. Mortgages had been carved into exotic investments and peddled around the globe, meaning they lurked everywhere. Distrust spread like a virus.

This time, the source of the trouble is both identifiable and relatively confined. Britain and the 27 remaining members of the European Union face significant uncertainty in their economic and financial dealings as they embark on complex divorce proceedings.

[How Britain leaving the EU could affect your wallet]

Fears that drawn-out negotiations could disrupt trade prompted investors to push their money toward safety. As night fell in London, the British pound was down more than 7 percent. Stock markets plummeted around the globe; the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index closed down 3.6 percent in New York. London closed down by a similar amount, and Tokyo surrendered more than 4 percent. Investors poured money into government bonds, seeking refuge.

"As of now, this doesn't look like an end-of-the-world event," said Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, an independent research organization. "It looks bad, but it's not a cataclysmic game-changer similar to Lehman." Then he paused. "Yet."

ADVERTISEMENT

In the best case, the plunge in markets represents an abrupt adjustment to the changing geography of global commerce. Britain has been diminished as a place for banking and business, and so the pound has lost some luster.

In the worst case, investors have begun a fearful march away from risk, potentially starving emerging markets and stripping European countries of needed capital. It could last as long as the uncertainties dogging Europe — perhaps years.

If recent traumas have clarified anything, it is the tendency for trouble to emerge unexpectedly. The global financial system is so intertwined that links can remain opaque.

One key factor undergirds confidence that the so-called Brexit will not deliver Lehman-like troubles. In 2008, central banks on both sides of the Atlantic failed to recognize the mounting disaster. They failed to prepare adequate relief. While people may argue over the degree to which regulators have tamed the speculative excesses of finance, few dispute that improvements have been delivered.

"The financial systems in the U.S. and Europe, including the U.K., are far more capitalized and less leveraged than they were in 2008," said Adam S. Posen, a former member of the rate-setting committee at the Bank of England and now president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington.

The Bank of England and the European Central Bank have tools they can wield to defuse threats to banks. They can simply print money and lend it out as needed.

Less than an hour after markets opened Friday in London, Britain's central bank governor, Mark Carney, stood before television cameras and struck a resolute pose as he promised to do what it took to stabilize markets. He announced that he was prepared to unleash another 250 billion pounds (about $370 billion) in pursuit of financial tranquillity.

[Populist anger upends politics on both sides of the Atlantic]

"We expect institutions to draw on this funding if and when appropriate," Carney said. "The bank will assess economic conditions and will consider any additional policy responses."

Those words appeared to assuage fears, as the pound and stock prices both pared their losses.

In recent years, the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank have subjected financial institutions to so-called stress tests. They regularly scrutinize banks' portfolios and the money they hold in reserve to make sure they can hold up in various outbreaks of trouble.

These tests have been welcomed by economists as a helpful addition to the warning system. Just this week, major U.S. banks all gained passing grades.

Yet, these are academic exercises.

"This is the real stress test," said Simon Johnson, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund and a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management.

[World leaders, activists and Wall Street traders: The many faces of Brexit]

The immediate run on stocks and currencies might yet grow into something worse, shaking consumer confidence and prompting households to limit their spending. As businesses lose profit opportunities, they are likely to put off investing and hiring.

If that happens, it could create a spiral ending in recession, both in Britain and across Europe, adding to pressure on banks. The markets seemed to be warning of this possibility as they savaged the value of banking stocks Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The triumph of the Brexit campaign has also invigorated separatist inclinations elsewhere, in Scotland, the Netherlands and beyond.

The greater the odds that the European Union will splinter, the more investors are likely to demand extra payouts for fresh loans to debt-saturated countries like Greece, Italy and Portugal. That could squeeze businesses there, making it harder for them to borrow, further crimping their economies.

"That could then spread to the banks and go global, and that could smell like a Lehman," said Markus Schomer, chief economist for PineBridge Investments, a global asset management firm. He put very low odds on this "referendum contagion" case.

ADVERTISEMENT