HARD AGROUND - Wreck of the Exxon Valdez - March 24, 1989

Contents

Home
Introduction
The Event
The Clean-Up
The Impact On Life
The Captain
The Ship
The Legal Battles
The Legacy

Links
Reading List/a>
Image Gallery

Timeline
Maps

Search
ADN Archives

Permissions
User Agreement

Line

Sponsored by:
Anchorage
Daily News

Story Index:
Main | The Legal Battles
Overall: story 216 of 380 Previous Next
The Legal Battles story 13 of 87 Previous Next

JUDGE IN OIL-SPILL CASE REFUSES TO PERMIT CLASS-ACTION LAWSUITS

By MARILEE ENGE
Daily News reporter

Anchorage Daily News
Date: 12/21/90
Day: Friday
Edition: Final
Section: Metro
Page: C2

ANCHORAGE- A federal judge has spurned class-action lawsuits against Exxon and other defendants in the March 24, 1989, Prince William Sound oil spill and encouraged individual plaintiffs to make claims against a $100 million liability fund controlled by the oil industry.

Judge H. Russel Holland has refused to recognize any classes of plaintiffs not fishermen, not environmentalists, not even Native villagers whose subsistence lifestyle was disrupted by the spreading tide of toxic crude.

Holland said certifying "many separate classes" would create confusion and would be inferior to other management plans, which he did not detail.

Individual plaintiffs are generally recognized as a class when they share common interests and their cases are similar in fact and law. But judges have considerable discretion.

Native villagers from Prince William Sound were one of the groups arguing for class certification.

"This is one accident that affected many people in a similar way. It affected all the Native people in a similar way," said attorney Lloyd Miller, who represents villages and is a liaison for all the plaintiffs in Exxon litigation.

"Obviously, I disagree with Judge Holland's conclusions," Miller said. "What this lawsuit is about is Exxon's conduct, and what Exxon is guilty of. The events that led up to the disaster are obviously common issues."

But not all the plaintiffs favored class actions.

Soldotna attorney Bob Cowan, who represents a commercial fisherman, said some fishermen are more successful than others, so their damages were greater from sitting out a season. Because different fishermen suffered different losses, "you have to deal with them separately anyway."

In state court, meanwhile, Superior Court Judge Brian Shortell allowed cannery workers to sue collectively, saying that a class action is superior to forcing individuals to each sue Exxon alone.

The cannery workers were the first class considered by Shortell, who has said he will accept or deny other class actions in the next few months. That could point the way to important differences in the way cases are organized between the two courts.

Meanwhile, Holland encouraged, but did not require Exxon Valdez oil spill victims to make claims against the Trans Alaska Pipeline Liability Fund. He backed away from a tentative decision announced in September that all plaintiffs might be required to exhaust the fund before suing Exxon.

Attorneys representing people seeking damages for the 11-million-gallon spill said they will advise their clients to submit claims to the pipeline fund soon, but continue the suits in federal court.

The $100 million fund must be spread among thousands of people seeking damages, and the claims from the Exxon oil spill are expected to greatly exceed that amount.


Story Index:
Main | The Legal Battles
Overall: story 216 of 380 Previous Next
The Legal Battles story 13 of 87 Previous Next

   
Want to read more articles on this topic? ADNSearch.com has full-text articles published in the Anchorage Daily News Text Archives from late 1985 to the present - available to you with the click of your mouse. Make the Anchorage Daily News your source for Alaska and Anchorage history. Check out www.adnsearch.com right now!
All components of this site are copyright 1989-1999 by the Anchorage Daily News, Anchorage, Alaska unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized reproduction or use of any material available from this site is strictly prohibited. For information on obtaining reprints of, or republication rights to any of these materials, see Permissions.
We welcome your comments or questions regarding this site - webteam@adn.com
Anchorage Daily News Alaska's Eyewitness to History