HARD AGROUND - Wreck of the Exxon Valdez - March 24, 1989

Contents

Home
Introduction
The Event
The Clean-Up
The Impact On Life
The Captain
The Ship
The Legal Battles
The Legacy

Links
Reading List/a>
Image Gallery

Timeline
Maps

Search
ADN Archives

Permissions
User Agreement

Line

Sponsored by:
Anchorage
Daily News

Story Index:
Main | The Legal Battles
Overall: story 357 of 380 Previous Next
The Legal Battles story 83 of 87 Previous Next

EXXON APPEALS VERDICT
COMPANY REPEATS ITS SPILL ARGUMENT

By JIM CLARKE
The Associated Press

Anchorage Daily News
Date: 06/20/97
Day: Friday
Edition: Final
Section: Metro
Page: B1

ANCHORAGE- Exxon Corp. on Thursday delivered to a federal appeals court its arguments for throwing out the $5.3 billion verdict an Anchorage jury awarded to fishermen, Natives and others harmed by the 11 million-gallon Exxon Valdez oil spill.

The appeal, to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, contends U.S. District Judge Russel Holland erred when he allowed the jury to award $5 billion in punitive damages for the March 1989 spill in Prince William Sound. An additional $287 million in actual damages also was awarded in the 1994 trial.

As it did in the lower court, the oil company is contending punitive damages weren't warranted in the case because Congress had spelled out what types of actions were needed to punish oil spillers and to deter oil spills.

But even if punitive damages are allowed as a matter of law, Exxon said in a statement released Thursday, a $900 million settlement with the state reached in 1991 precludes any more punitive damages.

The company also said the $3.5 billion it has spent to clean up the spill is punishment enough.

''The punitive damage verdict sends a perverse message that those who acknowledge their responsibilities and take prompt and costly remedial action will still face disproportionate punishment,'' Lee Raymond, chairman of the Irving, Texas-based company, said in the statement.

The company had told the appeals court in February that it planned to appeal.

One of the attorneys representing the more than 20,000 plaintiffs in the case said issues Exxon is raising now are not new.

''These are arguments that they have repeatedly argued and lost before Judge Holland,'' said Jerry Nolting of Minneapolis, who had not seen the appeal brief. ''They're bad issues.''

Nolting and other attorneys for spill victims have said the $5 billion punitive award isn't excessive for a company as wealthy as Exxon.

''Their stock price since the day of the spill has tripled,'' Nolting said. ''We've always said the punitive award isn't even a hiccup to Exxon.''

David Heilbron, a lawyer in San Francisco who helped prepare Exxon's appeal, disagreed.

''That is an odd notion of what a hiccup is and it also is a disconnect'' that shows no recognition of Exxon's exemplary conduct after the spill, he said. ''It just does not put its finger on what matters.''

Heilbron also said that if the court decides some punitive damages are reasonable, the amount the Anchorage jury awarded ''is off the charts.

''The Supreme Court has expressed its real distress with punitive damages run wild,'' he said. ''If this $5 billion award is not beyond the limits, then there are none.''

Exxon stock was down 50 cents to $62.871/2 per share in Thursday trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Adjusted for splits, the stock traded at $22.25 on March 23, 1989, the day before the spill.


Story Index:
Main | The Legal Battles
Overall: story 357 of 380 Previous Next
The Legal Battles story 83 of 87 Previous Next

   
Want to read more articles on this topic? ADNSearch.com has full-text articles published in the Anchorage Daily News Text Archives from late 1985 to the present - available to you with the click of your mouse. Make the Anchorage Daily News your source for Alaska and Anchorage history. Check out www.adnsearch.com right now!
All components of this site are copyright 1989-1999 by the Anchorage Daily News, Anchorage, Alaska unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized reproduction or use of any material available from this site is strictly prohibited. For information on obtaining reprints of, or republication rights to any of these materials, see Permissions.
We welcome your comments or questions regarding this site - webteam@adn.com
Anchorage Daily News Alaska's Eyewitness to History