HARD AGROUND - Wreck of the Exxon Valdez - March 24, 1989

Contents

Home
Introduction
The Event
The Clean-Up
The Impact On Life
The Captain
The Ship
The Legal Battles
The Legacy

Links
Reading List/a>
Image Gallery

Timeline
Maps

Search
ADN Archives

Permissions
User Agreement

Line

Sponsored by:
Anchorage
Daily News

Story Index:
Main | The Ship
Overall: story 49 of 380 Previous Next
The Ship story 1 of 22 Previous Next

PORTLAND BALKS AT TAKING TANKER

By The Associated Press

Anchorage Daily News
Date: 04/04/89
Day: Tuesday
Edition: Final
Section: Metro
Page: C1

PORTLAND, ORE.- Officials of the Port of Portland say they have some reservations about accepting the $12 million repair job on the Exxon Valdez. "We're not willing to trade in the environment for jobs," port spokesman Darrel Buttice said of the repair work, which could generate 200 jobs.

Buttice said Exxon got ahead of itself in announcing Sunday that the tanker would come to Portland's dry dock for repairs.

The wreck of the Exxon Valdez on March 24 caused the biggest oil spill in U.S. history. More than 10 million gallons of crude oil has spilled into Alaska's Prince William Sound.

Frank Iarossi, president of Exxon Shipping Co., told The Oregonian that a trailing sheen of oil may follow the tanker as it passes up the Columbia River to Portland.

"We have no confirmation at this time that the vessel is coming here," Buttice said Monday. "A variety of questions need to be asked" before the ship would be accepted in Portland, he said.

Buttice said either Exxon or the company that wins the repair contract would have to contact the port.

"We do have authority to turn down business," he said.

Officials on Monday began forming an Oregon Watch task force to consider whether the tanker should be allowed to complete its repairs in Portland.

Panel members included representatives of the Port, the Coast Guard, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Department of Environmental Quality.

"I think we have some serious reservations about (the vessel leaking oil)," said Bruce Sutherland, an analyst and planner for oil spill hazards for the Department of Environmental Quality.

Sutherland said a small amount of oil can cause a sheen, but any leak would have to be examined carefully. It is against the law to spill oil in the Columbia, and even a "sheen" would have to be reported, he said.

"We do get spills on the Columbia on a regular basis, usually under 100 gallons," said DEQ spokeswoman Shirley Kengla. The Coast Guard has skimmers and booms for the cleanup in such small spills.

A leak of a thousand gallons is another matter, she said.

"Our lips are zipped," said Bill Zabin, president of Northwest Marine Iron Works Inc., one of three companies vying for the repair job. Northwest Marine, Cascade General Inc. and West State Inc. refused comment Monday at Exxon's request.

Drydock 4, the port's largest, was designed specifically to handle work for the Alaska oil tanker fleet, said Port spokesman Dick Montgomery. Since 1979, it has repaired 314 vessels, generated $500 million in business and employed an average of 750 people per year.


Story Index:
Main | The Ship
Overall: story 49 of 380 Previous Next
The Ship story 1 of 22 Previous Next

   
Want to read more articles on this topic? ADNSearch.com has full-text articles published in the Anchorage Daily News Text Archives from late 1985 to the present - available to you with the click of your mouse. Make the Anchorage Daily News your source for Alaska and Anchorage history. Check out www.adnsearch.com right now!
All components of this site are copyright 1989-1999 by the Anchorage Daily News, Anchorage, Alaska unless otherwise noted. Unauthorized reproduction or use of any material available from this site is strictly prohibited. For information on obtaining reprints of, or republication rights to any of these materials, see Permissions.
We welcome your comments or questions regarding this site - webteam@adn.com
Anchorage Daily News Alaska's Eyewitness to History