On-site marijuana consumption is on the Anchorage ballot this spring. Here’s what to know.

This spring, voters will decide whether Anchorage will join cities like Fairbanks, Juneau and Ketchikan in allowing people to smoke marijuana on-site.

Ballot Proposition 11 would legalize on-site consumption in Anchorage, but under strict regulations. The room where people could smoke marijuana would be sequestered from the rest of the retail store. If indoors, it would have a separate door and could only be accessed from inside the building.

Outdoor areas would need to be hidden from sight. Odor from people smoking the marijuana would need to be undetectable by a person with normal sense of smell from the property’s lot line.

The smoking lounges would be monitored by employees from a smoke-free environment, though the employees could enter the lounge during an emergency.

A patron could purchase up to 1 gram to consume on-site.

[Alaska marijuana industry works to influence local politicians]

A business would need to have on-site consumption endorsement approved by the Anchorage Assembly. City code enforcement makes sure retail shops comply with the regulations. If a shop were to violate regulations, the Assembly could revoke that endorsement.


The April 7 election is vote-by-mail. Those ballots were sent out March 17. Ballots can be submitted at drop-off centers, or sent through the mail. They must be postmarked by April 7.

According to attorney Jana Weltzin, who represents marijuana businesses around the state, it would cost around $50,000 to $100,000 to build an on-site consumption room in Anchorage. She guessed about five of her local clients would apply for an on-site consumption license.

Any business that applies for an on-site consumption license would need to show plans complying with the regulations and have signs advertising the health risks and that it illegal to drive while impaired.

The state of Alaska legalized on-site consumption about a year ago, but gave individual cities the choice to decide whether they wanted to allow it. The Anchorage Assembly voted in October to send the question to the ballot.

[A majority of Anchorage Assembly seats are up for election. Here’s who’s running.]

The main argument from proponents, such as industry representatives and some Assembly members, is that on-site consumption is tourist-friendly. Outsiders flock to Alaska in the summer, and some want to sample the cannabis legal here, but not in their home state. However, hotels don’t allow people to smoke marijuana in the rooms, and it’s illegal to smoke outside.

On-site consumption allows local businesses to cater to that specific need.

The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network on Saturday submitted an independent expenditure report, showing it has spent about $10,000 opposing the proposition.

Former Assemblyman Dick Traini testified to the Assembly against the concept in October. He and former Assemblymen Paul Honeman and Eric Croft, a 2021 mayoral candidate, recently wrote an op-ed on why they are against the idea.

They mostly did so on the grounds of workplace safety and the potential for increased driver impairment.

“I have long been a supporter of legalized marijuana. I think it makes so much more sense to regulate it and tax it than throw people in jail for it,” Croft said. “But I think pot bars, and Anchorage being one of the first cities to allow it, is a bad idea.”

Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly stated that no political group had spent money opposing Proposition 11.

Aubrey Wieber

Aubrey Wieber covers Anchorage city government, politics and general assignments for the Daily News. He previously covered the Oregon Legislature for the Salem Reporter, was a reporter for the Salt Lake Tribune and Bend Bulletin, and was a reporter and editor at the Post Register in Idaho Falls. Contact him at