Skip to main Content
Anchorage

Assembly candidate Q&A: What grade do you give the current Assembly?

  • Author:
  • Updated: September 28, 2016
  • Published March 28, 2014

Anchorage residents will vote on candidates for six open seats on the 11-member Anchorage Assembly at the municipal election on April 1. To give readers a better sense of who they'd be voting for, the Daily News asked each of the 13 hopefuls a series of questions on their backgrounds and on key issues facing the city.

GRADE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CURRENT ASSEMBLY, A-F. ELABORATE.

East Anchorage

• Adam Trombley: B. Most of the time the Assembly finds an adequate compromise to contentious issues.

• Mao Tosi: C+, I think they're doing as well as they can and have many tough decisions to make but I hope these decisions are for the benefit of our city and not personal gain.

• Pete Petersen: D. Tax are up yet services are still getting cut, and the Assembly was wrong to deny people their right to testify on controversial legislation.

South Anchorage

• Pete Nolan: A-. For the most part they have made good decisions, with only occasional ventures into things they should not be doing.

• Bill Evans: B. Good job on reigning in costs. But repeal of AO37 did not help. The lengthy debate over tennis courts was out-of-proportion to the issue.

• Bruce Dougherty: D (grading on a curve) Our city government needs to be fully transparent and cooperation needs to be embraced.

West Anchorage

• Phil Isley: Tim is a nice guy but I would give him a C due to lack of enthusiasm and leadership.

• Tim Steele: C+ Too much plotting, planning and useless or unproductive maneuvering.

Eagle River-Chugiak

• Bill Starr: B. We have generally done a good job of providing check and balance government. We could do better explaining issues and listening to those we serve.

• Sharon GIBBONS: We all have room to do better. We have strengths in some areas and weaknesses in others. There is always room to learn, grow and do better.

Midtown

• Elvi Gray-Jackson: It is so important for the Assembly to remember that we are there on behalf of the citizens of Anchorage. We are a nonpartisan community and take an oath to represent, to the best of our ability, the citizens of Anchorage. Often, some of my colleagues don't remember that oath.

Downtown- Mountain View

• Patrick Flynn: B, We generally work well together but I am disappointed when my colleagues allow political allegiance to trump community priorities.

• Mark Martinson: D, they seem to go along with the group even if it doesn't make long term sense.Assembly candidates on the issues

Anchorage

For more newsletters click here

Local news matters.

Support independent, local journalism in Alaska.

Comments