Letter: No need to revisit Roadless Rule

What will be left for our grandkids? That's how I think of resource management — and I wish Gov. Bill Walker and the Trump administration would too. Both the state and the Trump administration want to drag us back to the old days of taxpayer-subsidized clear-cuts by gutting the current "Roadless Rule" on the Tongass.

This is a terrible idea — and I'm speaking as a longtime Southeast resident who makes his living from the forest as a small-scale logger and woodworker. It's time to face the facts: Big Timber logged the most profitable old growth on the Tongass between the 1950s-1990s.

However, there is still room for a small-scale timber industry, and thousands of miles of logging roads already exist in the Tongass. It's an abomination to suggest taxpayers subsidize more logging roads to ship old-growth trees overseas or send them, with minimal processing, through the one remaining large sawmill in Southeast. We can have both a small scale timber industry and respect that intact old-growth forest sustains commercial fisherman, tourism, and subsistence for locals.

There is more than ample room for smart development within the current Roadless Rule. I strongly encourage everyone to do some research and contact both the U.S. Forest Service and Gov. Walker.
— Zach LaPerriere

Have something on your mind? Send to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Letters under 200 words have the best chance of being published. Writers should disclose any personal or professional connections with the subjects of their letters. Letters are edited for accuracy, clarity and length.