Trump's promise of an immigration crackdown faces logistical hurdles

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's efforts to secure the nation's borders and get tough on unauthorized immigrants, announced just days after he took office, face serious logistical problems along with the legal challenges that threaten his ability to make good on a central campaign promise.

The crackdown requires a vast commitment of resources, including hiring 15,000 new border patrol and immigration enforcement agents, which officials say will take at least two years to accomplish.

Large detention centers for thousands of Central American asylum seekers who cross the southern border will need to be built because of an executive order by Trump calling for an end to "catch and release" — the Obama administration policy that the immigrants be released temporarily into the United States while their cases are processed.

[Trump budget hit list contains programs long in GOP sights]

In the meantime, the White House has not produced a replacement for another executive order by Trump, a ban on travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries that was blocked by a federal court. The president said Thursday that to withstand the legal challenges, his lawyers are preparing a more narrow executive order that is likely to exempt green card holders, students, tech workers and those with long-standing connections to the United States.

In a rambling news conference Thursday, the president said his administration had undertaken "the most substantial border security measures in a generation," and he said that efforts to find and deport "criminal aliens" would make the United States safer.

"Some people are so surprised that we're having strong borders," Trump said. "Well, that's what I've been talking about for a year and a half, strong borders. They're so surprised: 'Oh, he is having strong borders.' Well, that's what I've been talking about to the press and to everybody else."


But his early efforts to translate all of that talk into action are running into the reality of governing in Washington, where legal constraints on taking action — and debates about paying for it — are legendary.

Trump has promised to hire 15,000 new Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents as part of a larger deportation force that can remove millions of unauthorized immigrants from the United States, something he repeatedly promised to do during the campaign.

But hiring such a large number of agents in a short period of time would be nearly impossible, according to John F. Kelly, the former general whom Trump chose to be the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

"I don't believe we're going to get 10,000 and 5,000 on board within the next couple of years," Kelly told lawmakers on Capitol Hill this month, explaining that stringent hiring standards and training regimens slow down the process.

"I'd rather have fewer and make sure that they're high-quality people that are already serving in those organizations, already well trained, but I will not skimp on the training and the standards," Kelly said.

One of the problems that Kelly faces is a polygraph test that prospective agents, including those seeking to work for the Border Patrol, must take. According to a former senior homeland security official, nearly 60 percent of applicants fail it.

The test was first put in place after another surge in hiring during the George W. Bush administration. Thousands of people were hired without being properly vetted, which resulted in dozens of corruption cases involving Border Patrol and other agents, who were accused of taking bribes and providing information to Mexican drug cartels.

The former senior homeland security official, James Tomsheck, who was assistant commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, office of internal affairs, said in several cases many of the new hires were members of the cartels.

"The corruption and excessive use of force that plague the agency is a direct result of a hiring mandate to hire too many people to rapidly without the proper vetting," said Tomsheck, who was removed from his position after, he said, he was accused of being too aggressive in pursuing excessive use-of-force cases.

It is unclear how Trump and Kelly plan to solve the manpower problem.

[A big problem on the U.S. border: Corrupt agents]

One option, swiftly denied Friday by the White House, was a plan to use as many as 100,000 National Guard troops as part of a nationwide deportation force that would help to augment federal agents and local authorities newly deputized to enforce the nation's immigration laws.

The idea emerged in a draft memorandum, first reported by The Associated Press, which asserted that National Guard troops, under the direction of governors in border states, are "particularly well suited to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law and augment border security operations by Department components."

Gillian M. Christensen, acting press secretary for the Department of Homeland Security, said the memorandum was a "very early, pre-decisional draft that never made it to the secretary and was never seriously considered by the department." Sean Spicer, White House press secretary, said Friday morning that the report by The Associated Press was "100 percent not true."

But advocates for immigrants reacted with alarm.

"The administration wants to put on a show," said Kevin Appleby, senior director of international migration policy at the Center for Migration Studies of New York. "Their intent is to create fear, to create an environment in which people either self-deport or hide in the shadows."

The proposal to deploy 100,000 troops would be a stark increase in the size and scope of National Guard involvement in border security, but it is not unprecedented.


Several presidents, including George Bush and Barack Obama, called up thousands of National Guard troops to bolster border patrol operations. While they mostly acted as extra eyes to spot illegal border crossings, at times they carried weapons and assisted in drug arrests.

In 1916, in response to cross-border raids by Mexican bandits and what The New York Times described as a "prairie fire of anti-American sentiment that has been sweeping northern Mexico," President Woodrow Wilson deployed more than 100,000 guardsmen to the border to reinforce regular Army units.

More recently, in July 2014, Rick Perry, then governor of Texas, ordered 1,000 National Guard troops to its border with Mexico in an effort to bolster his border-security credentials as he prepared to start his presidential campaign.

The deployment has been costly, controversial and continues to this day. The troops live in hotels along the border during their deployments, and the estimate of the costs in 2014 were $12 million a month.

Perry's efforts coincided with an influx of undocumented Central American immigrants coming across the border, including unaccompanied children and teenagers. Experts expect another surge in arrivals this spring.

[Good luck making America safe again without the Mexican military, experts say]

In Trump's executive order calling for an end to "catch and release," he also directed Kelly to do everything possible to "construct, operate, or control facilities to detain aliens at or near the land border with Mexico." Immigration experts said that will be costly and take time.

"The bottom line is," Appleby said, "they're doing everything they can legally do until they're told not to by the courts to expand their capacity to deport as many people as possible."