OPINION: Infrastructure finance bill is a win-win for Alaska

Politics is often viewed as a zero-sum game in which one side wins at the expense of another, but the general obligation bond proposal introduced by my administration represents a win-win for Alaskans.

Known as GO bonds, this financing instrument for infrastructure projects must be approved first by the Legislature, and then by the voters in the general election.

I have always said that we must trust the people if we want them to trust us, and Alaskans will have their voices heard at the ballot box, as required in our constitution for the issuance of GO bonds.

I trust Alaskans, and I am confident in the case we can make to the people about the benefits of this proposal to build a safer, stronger state.

As proposed, my administration’s GO bond proposal requires financing for about $325 million to cover more than a dozen projects including roads, ports, harbors and airports.

A GO bond package approved by legislators and ultimately the voters is a means for Alaskans to control our own destiny.

The projects span the state from the Northwest to Southeast, and from the Interior to Southcentral.


In Southcentral, we have several projects that will all facilitate growth and promote safety. With far more pilots and aircraft per capita than any other state, we will expand and improve the regional airports in Palmer and Wasilla.

At Palmer, we will construct a new taxiway to reach additional lots, improve access for larger aircraft, and install additional safety measures such as LED lights and illuminated signs.

In Wasilla, where 144 aircraft are now based, we will extend the runway to accommodate National Guard training and larger craft, enlarge the apron to add tie-down spaces, and build a passenger terminal.

We know our Southcentral ports in Anchorage and across the Knik Arm at Point MacKenzie are vital to Alaska, so we propose to strengthen and expand current capacity with concepts that include completing the rail link to Port MacKenzie and improving cruise ship access in Anchorage.

Finally, we promote safety and ease congestion in one of the busiest parts of Anchorage by completing a three-quarter mile extension of Elmore Road to add northern access to what’s known as the U-Med District, where thousands of Alaskans work at some of our largest employers.

Alaskans have consistently shown their willingness to invest in capital projects through prudent financing going back to statehood, and that was at a time when we still had an income tax.

In total, Alaskans have approved GO bonds 16 times since 1960 to raise approximately $3 billion to build out infrastructure for our vast state that benefits our economy and our workforce.

A natural question is: Why finance these projects instead of paying for them outright? The answer is that in the current interest rate environment, our investment returns over the long-term are greater than the costs of paying down our debts.

Because of strong investment returns, our obligations to our state pension system are virtually erased and that lowers our budget costs over time.

Fixed costs of state government like retirement and debt service are on the decline while revenue outlooks are increasingly positive. The state is well positioned to afford a responsible level of new debt to address these needs and priorities.

As a result of this improved budget situation, I will not consider using general fund dollars to pay for projects that will cost less over the long-term to finance.

Another question: Why take on debt when Congress is supposedly showering states with federal infrastructure money?

The answer to that is many projects that are a priority at the state or local level are not necessarily priorities at the federal level, nor is the state in line to receive a pile of largely unrestricted funds, as was the case with the COVID-19 relief bills.

While there are some competitive grants available in the recent infrastructure bill, many funding opportunities require state matches ranging from 10% to 35%.

I’ve heard the voices of those who see a contradiction in the receipt of federal funds compared to my criticism of the current administration. Some have suggested I should be thanking the Biden administration instead. One senator went so far as to say that I shouldn’t “bite the hand” that feeds Alaska.

To be clear, the Alaska I envision is one that feeds itself, not an Alaska that depends on the federal government to eat.

The credit for every benefit to Alaska within this infrastructure bill goes to the hard work of our congressional delegation, and its dedicated representation of our interests is always appreciated.


As champions for our resource development opportunities, they know as well as I do that money from the federal government is no substitute for failing to fulfill its obligations spanning from the Statehood Act to the 2017 legislation that required lease sales to be held in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge coastal plain.

So, for those who believe I should thank the Biden administration that has been attacking Alaska like no other state since day one, I can only say to prepare for disappointment.

Although we may be treated like one by this administration, Alaska is not a second-class state. We will utilize the same traditional infrastructure matching programs available to our 49 fellow states.

We will not apologize for it, nor will we give up our right to speak out against this administration, or to defend the rights of Alaskans when necessary, regardless of whether we receive federal funds.

To suggest we bite our tongues lest we bite the federal hand only underscores the danger of relying on federal funds to support our state.

My administration is digging into this 1,000-page bill to better understand exactly what it means to Alaska, and as more federal guidance is received explaining the rules for this spending, and the state matches needed, the bond package may change.

It can also change based on input from Alaskans and their legislators. This is not a take-it-or-leave-it piece of legislation.

My administration is willing and ready to work with legislators and listen to Alaskans in order to have the best proposal possible that can earn the support it needs from a majority of voters.

For a full list of projects, estimated costs, and potential federal matching, please visit omb.alaska.gov and select “Proposed Budget.” From there, you can scroll down the page to the section about the FY2023 GO bond proposal for more details.

Mike Dunleavy is the 12th governor of Alaska.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.

Mike Dunleavy

Gov. Mike Dunleavy, R-Wasilla, is the 12th governor of the state of Alaska.