Letters to the Editor

Letter: $3,000 dividend is irresponsible

As a several-decade resident of Alaska, I am disappointed and unhappy with the extreme, myopic budget vetoes. Alaska’s fiscal crisis did not suddenly surface. Reality has been postponed for years. Supporting a $3,000 Permanent Fund dividend is irresponsible. PFD payout amounts have ranged from the lowest, $331 in 1984, to the highest, $2,072 in 2015, for the years of payouts from its inception in 1982.

At UAA, the first lesson from Professor Hill in Economics 101 was: TINSTAAFL or “There is no such thing as a free lunch.” Irresponsible, drastic cutting comes with the cost of lost incomes and purchasing power of workers and a diminished quality of life across the state.

Solely cutting the budget is not a fiscally responsible solution. We need to increase revenue as well. Although it may not be popular, it is past time to reinstate an income tax — especially to capture some revenue from out of state workers, who should contribute to our state’s infrastructure, maintenance, expenses and quality of life, and implement a seasonal sales tax exempting food, prescriptions and personal hygiene items.

Furthermore, eliminate oil tax credits. The mature approach is to be self-supporting and for businesses to pay their fair shares. I’d appreciate a reduced PFD, closer to $1,000, as part of a multi-pronged, responsible, long-term approach to our fiscal reality. I do not want Alaska to suffer a recession.

— Jo Bennett

Anchorage

Have something on your mind? Send to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Letters under 200 words have the best chance of being published. Writers should disclose any personal or professional connections with the subjects of their letters. Letters are edited for accuracy, clarity and length.

ADVERTISEMENT