Letters to the Editor

Letter: Fish Creek estuary

It seems that not all of the right questions are being asked about the possible use of the railroad easement at the Fish Creek estuary for either a residential privacy screen or a public recreational trail.

The Alaska Railroad Corp. holds an easement only for railroad purposes over this property. There is a question whether the possible use of ARRC’s easement for either a private residential screen or alternatively for a recreational trail is legally within ARRC’s ‘railroad’ purposes for its easement.

ARRC does not hold fee title to this property but only a surface easement.

The underlying landowner holding fee title, whoever that may be, must consent to the use of this tract as a privacy screen or as a recreational trail because its use for nonrailroad purposes will increase the legal burden on the underlying landowner’s property rights.

To date, I have seen no consideration given in this discussion to the underlying landowner’s right to consent to, or deny, either of these proposed non-railroad uses.

— T. E. Meacham


Have something on your mind? Send to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Letters under 200 words have the best chance of being published. Writers should disclose any personal or professional connections with the subjects of their letters. Letters are edited for accuracy, clarity and length.